ABSTRACT
Background: The rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla has historically presented significant challenges due to limited bone volume and poor bone quality. Pterygoid implants have emerged as a viable alternative to traditional methods, offering potential benefits in stability and load distribution.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the success rate of pterygoid implants in the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla through a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of existing literature.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies reporting the outcomes of pterygoid implants. The study population included 120 patients who received pterygoid implants between May 2023 and April 2024. Data were collected from multiple databases, focusing on implant survival rates, complications, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the overall success rate and to identify factors influencing outcomes.
Results: The meta-analysis revealed an overall success rate of 95% for pterygoid implants in the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla. The survival rate of the implants was high, with only a few reported cases of complications such as sinusitis and implant failure. Patient satisfaction was generally positive, with significant improvements in mastication and aesthetics reported. The success rate was found to be influenced by factors such as implant design, surgical technique, and patient-specific anatomical considerations.
Conclusion: Pterygoid implants demonstrated a high success rate in the rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla, offering a reliable alternative to traditional implant techniques. The positive outcomes highlighted the potential for pterygoid implants to address the challenges associated with posterior maxillary rehabilitation effectively. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended to validate these findings.
Keywords: Pterygoid implants, posterior maxilla, implant success rate, dental rehabilitation, meta-analysis, implant survival, patient satisfaction.